Education & Honors

Georgetown University Law Center, 2010, J.D., summa cum laude

Order of the Coif

Dean's List

Articles Editor, The Georgetown Law Journal

Vanderbilt University, 2007, B.A., summa cum laude

Phi Beta Kappa

Dean's List

Government service

Bristow Fellow, United States Department of Justice, Office of the Solicitor General, 2012-2013

Judicial Law Clerk,  Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 2011-2012

Judicial Law Clerk, Judge Amul R. Thapar, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, 2010-2011

Bar admissions

Virginia

Colorado 

Daniel C. Taylor

Denver Office
1801 Wewatta Street
Suite 1200
Denver, CO 80202
Back to previous page

Professional Practice

Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, 2013-Present, Partner (since 2017)

Cases tried or otherwise taken to judgment

A Pty Ltd. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (W.D. Texas 2016)
Counsel for Amazon in patent-infringement case. Obtained dismissal on ground that asserted patent failed to claim patentable subject matter under Section 101 of the Patent Act. Case is on appeal to the Federal Circuit.

Drake v. Allergan, Inc. (D. Vermont 2014)
Trial Counsel for Allergan in case involving claim that BOTOX® caused pediatric patient treated for muscle spasticity to experience seizures. Following a two-week trial, jury returned verdict for plaintiffs. Case settled on appeal.

Core-Mark v. Sonitrol (Adams County, Colo. 2014 and Colo. Ct. App. 2016)
Trial counsel for defendant Sonitrol, former subsidiary of Tyco International, in one-week damages-only trial where plaintiffs sought over $50 million in damages and interest because Sonitrol willfully and wantonly breached its burglar-alarm monitoring contract by failing to detect three burglars in plaintiffs’ warehouse who looted the warehouse and eventually lit fires that ultimately destroyed the building. The jury awarded plaintiffs the damages number sponsored by Sonitrol, which was roughly 10% of what plaintiffs were seeking and included no fire-related damages. Secured affirmance of judgment from the Colorado Court of Appeals.

Other representative cases

IGT v. Aristocrat Technologies (D. Nevada)
Counsel for IGT in patent-infringement action between major slot machine manufacturers. Case involves more than 30 patents and more than 100 accused games.  

Confidential AAA Arbitration (San Francisco, CA 2015)
Lead counsel for defendant in confidential AAA arbitration involving multi-million dollar claims resulting from mortgage insurance rescissions. Case settled favorably on the eve of the arbitration hearing.

Ideal Royalty Class Action (Santa Fe, NM, District of New Mexico, 2014-2015)
Trial counsel for Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co., a subsidiary of ConocoPhillips, in a certified class action alleging underpayment of royalties on natural gas in New Mexico's San Juan Basin. Case settled favorably shortly before trial after Bartlit Beck became involved.

Botox Litigation (Nationwide, 2013-2015)
Counsel for Allergan in numerous cases involving allegations that BOTOX® causes various injuries. Obtained favorable settlements in all cases.

Red Pine Point v. Amazon.com, Inc. (N.D. California 2014)
Counsel for Amazon in patent-infringement action concerning video streaming on Amazon devices. Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its claims against Amazon.

Confidential AAA Arbitration (New York, NY 2014)
Trial counsel for plaintiff in confidential patent-infringement arbitration involving printing plates.

previous representations

United States v. Gomez (U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 2013)
While an attorney in the United States Solicitor General's Office, briefed and argued on behalf of the United States appeal of federal criminal conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Court of appeals affirmed defendant's conviction and sentence.

Acknowledgements, presentations, and publications

Daniel C. Taylor, Note, Libel Tourism:  Protecting Authors and Preserving Comity, 99 Geo. L.J. (2010)

Daniel C. Taylor, Note, Taking Touhy Too Far:  Why it is Improper for Federal Agencies to Unilaterally Convert Subpoenas into FOIA Requests, 99 Geo. L.J. 1227 (2011) 

Big Wins