Sundeep K. (Rob) Addy
Bartlit Beck LLP, 2006-Present, Partner (since 2010)
Rob specializes in all types of large, complex commercial litigation with an emphasis in patent and antitrust work. A former journalist who worked on Emmy-award winning documentaries for PBS, Rob's focus as a litigator is in finding creative ways to convey complex stories to juries, judges, and arbitrators.
In his spare time, Rob can be found playing piano and recording music. He lives in Denver with his wife, Meredith, and their young son, August
Legal Malpractice Claim for Large Consumer Goods Manufacturer (Illinois State Court, Cook County)
Hired as trial counsel six weeks before trial in case alleging legal malpractice relating to advice on antidumping and countervailing duties. After two week trial, judge permitted case to go to the jury and jury returned defense verdict. Post-trial motions being prepared
U.S. Airways v. Sabre (S.D.N.Y.)
Trial counsel for Sabre in an antitrust action relating to a contract between U.S. Airways and Sabre concerning Sabre’s Global Distribution System. After a two-month trial, the jury returned a defense verdict on one claim and damages of 1% of what Plaintiff had sought on the second claim.
Xarelto Products Liability Litigation (E.D. La.)
Representing Bayer in lawsuits alleging personal injuries caused by the novel oral anticoagulant Xarelto. Responsible for case work-up in two federal bellwether cases, obtaining summary judgment of non-liability in one case.
In re Drywall MDL (E.D. Pa.)
Defending the leading U.S. drywall manufacturer against Sherman Act price-fixing claims. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act by conspiring to fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize prices for gypsum drywall. This multidistrict litigation matter was consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Litigation pending.
Realtime Adaptive Streaming v. Wowza Media Systems (U.S. District Court, Colorado; Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation)
Represented Wowza Media Systems in patent litigation brought by a non-practicing entity in the District of Colorado. Defeated a motion to centralize 23 patent cases into multidistrict litigation, or MDL. Case settled shortly thereafter.
Tessera Semiconductor Patent Litigation (U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas and N.D. California)
Trial counsel for Tessera enforcing groundbreaking patents related to semiconductor operation. Settled claims against Spansion for $25 million and with STATS Chippac, Siliconware, AMD, ChipMOS, Freescale, ASE, and STMicroelectronics for confidential amounts.
Cindy S. Whitmill v. Denver Housing Authority (Denver County Court)
Complete trial victory in pro bono case for client, a public housing resident, who was wrongfully evicted by the city housing authority.
Angelotti Chiropractic, Inc., et. al. v. Baker (C.D. Cal.)
Obtained preliminary injunction for a large group of medical care providers who were challenging the constitutionality of SB 863, a law that imposed dramatic new fees under California’s workers compensation system.
American Airlines v. Sabre Inc. et al. (N.D. Tex., Tarrant County, Tex.)
Trial counsel for Sabre in breach of contract and antitrust actions relating to the display of American's flight and fares in Sabre's Global Distribution System. American claimed $1 billion dollars in damages. Jury trial in Texas state court. Case settled favorably during trial.
Bayer Schering Pharma AG & Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Watson Labs, et al. (D. Nev.)
Obtained summary judgment of validity, infringement, and enforceability for Bayer Schering in Hatch-Waxman patent litigation against challengers seeking to market generic versions of oral contraceptive YAZ®.
Pioneer Hi-Bred International v. Agrigenetics, Inc. (S.D. Ind.)
Trial counsel for Pioneer in a dispute with Agrigenetics and its parent Dow AgroSciences concerning the marketing of Pioneer seed genetics through particular distribution channels. Case settled during trial after Pioneer prevailed on a Daubert challenge to Plaintiffs’ damages expert, and after openings and cross examination of plaintiffs’ first witness.
ICE Corporation v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation et al. (10th Cir.)
Counsel for Hamilton Sundstrand and Ratier-Figeac in appeal of adverse jury verdict on a misappropriation of trade secrets claim under Kansas law. Obtained reversal of $9 million punitive damages award before the Tenth Circuit and prevailed on remand before the district court. Case settled favorably during subsequent appeal of the district court's remand decision.
In re Genetically Modified Rice Litigation (E.D. Mo.)
Defeated class certification in large MDL action for Bayer CropScience in litigation related to the presence of a strain of genetically-modified rice in the U.S. commercial rice supply. Ruling upheld on appeal.
Applied Medical Resources Co. v. U.S. Surgical Corp. et al. (C.D. Cal.)
Represented defendant United States Surgical Corporation, a subsidiary of Covidien, in pretrial-phase of patent infringement suit. Applied Medical alleged that U.S. Surgical infringed a medical device patent and sought up to $300 million in damages and an injunction. Bartlit Beck trial team eventually won non-infringement jury verdict after five-week trial, which was affirmed unanimously on appeal to the Federal Circuit. Prior to Bartlit Beck’s representation, U.S. Surgical had twice previously been found to willfully infringe the same patent.